Join the ListServ

To Join the Listserv (open to nonmembers) affordablehousingadvocates@groups.io

All members who provide email addresses will receive an electronic invitation to join the Affordable Housing Advocates e-mail listserv. ListServ is also available to nonmembers who sign up; there is a screening process to detect spammers.

Meeting notices and communications are sent electronically, not through US Mail.

Impacts of Housing Instability on the Health and Education of Women and Girls (graphics and handouts, Nov 2019)

Graphics and Handouts from event presented by Hamilton County Commission on Women and Girls, October 2019.

Housing Directly Effects Health Chart: Source Dr. Megan Rich

Hamilton County Housing Crisis Infographic Source: LISC/Dr. M. Rich

Economics of Housing- Hamilton County One Pager Source: R. Saperstein

Summary Notes from the Community Conversation: The Impact of Housing Insecurity on the Health & Education of Women & Girls, Nov 14, 2019

AHA Comments to Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan Committee Interview Date:  __10/29/19___________

Group Interviewed:  _Affordable Housing Advocates

1.What do you know about CMHA?

AHA is knowledgeable of CMHA’s role as the largest landlord in Hamilton County (public housing “asset management”) and the operator of the Housing Choice Voucher program.

2. Based on you knowledge of CMHA, what do you think we do well? What areas need improvement?

Strengths:

  • CMHA’s strengths include programs such as the family self-sufficiency program, employment opportunity and first learning program. CMHA has also reached out more to area social service groups.
  • CMHA has housing in most areas in Hamilton County.

Weaknesses:

  • CMHA continues to exhibit poor customer service and communication in general and negative responses when concerns or complaints are made. Staff seems overworked and undertrained.
  • There is a huge need for much improved maintenance in all CMHA housing.
  • CMHA needs to improve safety and security in all of its public housing.
  • CMHA has been filing a disproportionately high number of evictions. CMHA evicts too many residents; it needs to participate more with other agency’s programs to reduce evictions.
  • In HCV program, CMHA does little to help participants find housing. CMHA should do more, including reinstituting a mobility assistance program for HCV participants.
  • The HCV process is long and confusing for landlords and families, and it requires day time hours from participating families, often keeping them from working. From turning in RTAs with long waits, to getting paid months after a process begins, to back and forth paperwork on HAP contracts, it’s significantly more work for all involved than market rate renting.

3.) How do you view CMHA as a developer of Affordable Housing in the community?

CMHA should develop more affordable housing for very low income seniors, persons with disabilities and families with children. CMHA should work with units of local government to get assistance to develop more affordable housing throughout Hamilton County.

CMHA should not develop housing for households with incomes above or near median income.

4.) What can we do to enhance good partnerships throughout the community?

CMHA should work with units of local government to get assistance from them to develop more affordable housing throughout Hamilton County.

CMHA should be more transparent and engaged with the entire community. CMHA needs to become a trusted organization.

CMHA should work more effectively to increase landlord participation in the HCV program. An improved and expedited HCV process, including making the RTA and HAP process available electronically, would encourage more and better landlords to participate. It would also help participants get to work during weekday hours. The approval process for housing units, including inspections, should be faster.

5.) In the next 3-5 years, what would you like to see CMHA doing?

CMHA should renovate all its public housing and develop hundreds of additional units of housing for very low income households.  Amenities should be added to larger CMHA developments, including parking, laundry, and recreational and educational opportunities. The HCV program should work more effectively to provide a broad choice of good quality housing.

6.) What economic impact does CMHA have in the local economy?

CMHA has a huge impact on the community. If CMHA improves, it will improve the lives of the people it serves directly and the whole community.

7.) What areas of housing are missing / lacking locally and how do you think CMHA might play a role in filling this need?

CMHA must play a big role in reducing the affordable housing gap for very low income households. CMHA should develop more housing for very low income families, seniors and people with disabilities. Some of the new housing should be near I-275. CMHA should also focus on housing for long-time residents  in gentrifying areas to prevent displacement.

8.) What are the best communications methods to contract each target audience?

CMHA should communicate about its plans, successes and programs at all levels:  traditional local media, social media, public meetings, etc.

Communication with program participants should make use of email, text, as well as U.S. mail.

City of Cincinnati Anti-Eviction Ordinances Passed 10/30/19

Sponsor: Greg Landsman. Passed 7-1 10/30/19

“You are being asked to leave the premises”: A Study of Eviction in Cincinnati and Hamilton County, Ohio, 2014-2017

https://www.lascinti.org/wp-content/uploads/Eviction-Report_Final.pdf

Executive Summary

The lack of affordable housing throughout our nation is the root of several social problems, including poverty, homelessness, and educational and health disparities. Furthermore, the United States isamidst an eviction epidemic—millions of families are evicted each year. Evictions occur when landlords initiate the involuntary moves of their tenants formally through an eviction court or informally through other means. This report presents an analysis of formal eviction filings in Hamilton County, Ohio from four consecutive years, 2014 to 2017. The main findings follow:

  • Nearly half (42.3%) of all residences are renter-occupied in Hamilton County. From 2014 to 2017, an average of 12,439 residential evictions were filed in Hamilton County. The eviction filing rate (8.7%), or percentage of renter-occupied units that experience an eviction filing, sits well above the nation’s average (6.3%).
  • Importantly, less than one percent (0.4%) of eviction filings sampled in 2017 were decided in favor of the tenant. A large majority were either in favor of the landlord(47.6%) or were dismissed (49.9%). Cases may be dismissed at the landlord’s discretion for many reasons—due to their negotiation with the tenant, or due to the tenant’s decision to vacate the premises.
  • Unlike in criminal court, defendants(tenants) in eviction court are not given the right to legal representation. In Milwaukee, Desmond (2016) found that approximately 90% of landlords were represented by lawyers, while 90% of tenants were not. In Hamilton County, these disparities are even more alarming—88.2% of landlords had legal representation, while 97.5% of tenants did not. As a result, knowing they must stand toe-to-toe with a lawyer, many tenants will not show up to court to fight an eviction.
  • While all neighborhoods and communities in Hamilton County experienced at least one eviction filing between 2014 and 2017, they are highly concentrated in a few areas along patterns of racial residential segregation. On average, predominantly Black neighborhoods are those with the highest eviction filing rates, while neighborhoods with few Black residents experiences very few evictions. Additionally, neighborhoods experiencing high rates of eviction filings are also more likely to have lower household incomes and higher rates of poverty when compared to neighborhoods with low eviction filing rates. Eviction is more often identified as a major cause of poverty, rather than a consequence of it. As such, these neighborhoods remain poor because of systematic processes like eviction.
  • Although there are thousands of landlords in Hamilton County, only a relatively small amount are responsible for most evictions. Half of landlords in Hamilton County file fewer than ten evictions per year. Agencies and landlords known for providing housing to those in poverty are largely responsible for eviction filings. In every year during the study period, Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority (CMHA) filed the most evictions, representing 3.7-7.6% of all residential eviction filings. In 2017, CMHA was responsible for 5,583 public housing rental units, which means that approximately 1 in 6 households received an eviction notice. Additionally, known landlords who manage HUD-subsidized housing complexes, Brickstone of The Model Group and Wallick Hendy Properties, are also in the Top Ten of Eviction-Filing Landlords. In total, the top ten eviction-filing landlords consistently represent about 20% of all filings in Hamilton County.

Advocacy Alert from COHHIO: FUND THE STATE HOUSING TRUST FUND

May 2019

We’ve received a lot of calls recently from legislators and their staffers asking for guidance to respond to homeless constituents seeking assistance. We connect them to local homeless services, but legislators often find out that there are long waits for housing assistance in in their districts. Need is increasing, and housing resources are lacking.

We’re happy to assist legislators who are trying to do something to help homeless constituents when they call or show up in their office. But we’re also telling them that they can do more than just help that individual; they have the power to make systemic change to address the underlying problem.

Unfortunately, homeless and housing issues were overlooked when the governor introduced his budget earlier this spring. That’s why we’re calling on the legislature to expand the Ohio Housing Trust Fund, the primary state source of homeless and affordable housing services.

The budget recently passed the House without a Housing Trust Fund amendment, but we’re hopeful that the Senate will fix that when they revise the two-year spending plan soon. This recent Akron-Beacon Journal editorial summarizes the issue nicely. We have strong support from several influential senators for a Housing Trust Fund expansion, but legislators need to hear that their constituents want action on this issue if it’s going to pass.

So now is a good time to call your state senator and ask them to support an amendment to expand the Ohio Housing Trust Fund in the biennial budget (HB 166).

We’ve found the most effective way to change minds is to take policymakers out to see effective homeless and housing programs for themselves. It’s a lot easier to vote for something in the budget when you’ve met real people whose lives have been transformed by the programs it funds.

We know these direct contacts make the difference because the biggest supporters we have in the Senate have seen first-hand the organizations in their districts that are working to make home a reality for their most vulnerable constituents. That’s why we’ve been helping coordinate tours of housing programs for legislators and cabinet members. If you would like to help organize a tour in your area – please let us know.

While we have a good story to tell policymakers about reducing Ohio’s rates of chronic and veterans’ homelessness, the growing affordable housing shortage is pushing more families with children into homelessness. Comprehensive data from the Ohio Housing Finance Agency recently found a sharp increase in children driving the total homeless population higher to over 70,000. Nearly one-third are now children, including nearly 3,000 babies under age one.

Given the enormous gap between rising rents and incomes among low-wage workers, this problem will continue to get worse unless we get more funding into effective interventions and permanent housing solutions. Currently, most of the public resources come from the federal government. But the state can do a lot more to get at-risk children and families back into safe, decent affordable housing, and the Housing Trust Fund is the way to do it.

We’re also working with the DeWine Administration on a proposal to allocate a portion of Ohio’s federal Temporary Assistance to Needy Families funding for local rapid rehousing efforts. The Homeless Families Assistance Program is a great opportunity for the governor to do something to specifically target the population that the governor has prioritized – vulnerable young children.

On the federal level, there have been some positive developments lately. The House Appropriations Subcommittee that oversees HUD’s budget released it’s draft FY 2020 spending bill that would boost spending on affordable housing and homeless programs by at least $5.9 billion, and rejects the administration’s harmful policy proposals. Our friends at the National Low Income Housing Coalition have all the details. There’s still a long way to go, but the budget is off to a good start.

So stay tuned for updates about it by supporting a stronger HUD budget and an expansion of the Ohio Housing Trust Fund. And don’t forget – the National Housing Week of Action (May 30 – June 5) is a great time to speak out about the need for more affordable housing in Ohio!

Thanks for helping house Ohio,

Bill Faith
Executive Director